Prakash A S wrote:
> prakash srinivasan wrote:
> >>>>> printf(TOTAL LOOP TIMING=%ld us\n",
> >>>>> (long)((rt_timer_ticks2ns(end-start))/1000);
> >>>> What does: printf(TOTAL LOOP TIMING=%lld us\n",
> >>>> rt_timer_ticks2ns(end-start)/1000); report.
> >>> TOTAL LOOP TIMING = 5377070 us In this case, the (unsigned)
> >>> (long) (long)tart returns 1069623206 and (unsigned) (long)
> >>> (long)end returns 2151726697
> >> Are you happy with that result? Did really pass approx. 5 seconds
> > between start and end?
>
> Could you format your mails correctly to make them readable? Use text,
> not HTML, truncate at 72 characters, and use > as a quotation mark,
> meaning that one '>' is the sign that you quote someone, two '>' is you
> quoting someone who quoted someone else, etc... I am really sorry to
> have to tell you about this, this is really basic knowledge of the
> netiquette, we should not have to tell you about it.
>
> > Definitely not and I am not confident about this output. Coz in this
> > loop period I am sending datas from client to the server. Visibly
> > noted that the server is getting all the datas within a second. So I
> > am not sure the 5 sec is the right output. I just like to know all
> > the above conversions are correct? and is it ok that the start ticks
> > can be more than the end ticks?
>
> The result of rt_timer_read is a long long, so, if you cast it to an
> unsigned, you loose the most significant bits. So, the result is totally
> meaningless. This again, is basic knowledge of the C language, we should
> not have to explain.
>
> Your bug report is quite insufficient, we do not even know what version
> of Xenomai you use, maybe you are reporting a bug which has been solved
> a long time ago. Neither do we know what version of Linux and of the
> Adoes patch you use, or the contents of your .config file. We do not
> have a self-contained example that we can run to try and reproduce your
> issue.
>
> So if you want some answers, please give us the means to answer you.
>
>
> As an community person I AGREED with what you pointed out. My main mistake
> was I subscribed the
>
> mailing list with an useless mailID. Now I changed my mail ID. Surely you
> will get the proper
> quote in future. In between the mail change, I lost the continuation for this
> topic and did not
> get this reply mail to my new mail ID. Simply copy and pasted the last mail
> from the archive.
We still receive HTML.
>
> Obviously I should improve my C language skills.
>
> I am using linux kernel 2.6.30.8 on Ubuntu 8.04,
> Adeos-ipipe-2.6.30.8-x86-2.4-09.patch and Xenomai-2.5.3
What about the kernel configuration and self-contained test exhibiting
the behaviour you do not understand?
--
Gilles.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
