On 2011-03-04 09:30, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:09:57AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >> I'm not disagreeing. I'm just betting that MSI will quickly gain >> relevance there as well - up to the point where first devices no longer >> include with INTx support (perfectly legal, but I haven't seen one yet). > > IFAICT, PCIe cards are allowed, not required to offer INTx.
Yep. > > In my case, I already asked HW if they could enable INTx in the > design. The IP core would offer this, but there seems not to be > possible in combination with the particular SoC core attached. > > So, for now, it looks like I will have to find a way to support MSI... I see, you found that first example. :) Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
