On 2013-02-08 10:18, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 10:07 AM, Stéphane LOS wrote:
> 
>> Le 07/02/2013 17:11, Gilles Chanteperdrix a écrit :
>>> On 02/07/2013 03:53 PM, Stéphane LOS wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Sirs,
>>>>
>>>> Hilscher is offering a Linux driver based on UIO for cifX boards.
>>>>
>>>> In my understanding, down to 1ms cycle time, a PREEMPT RT solution
>>>> should be enough.
>>>>
>>>> The cifX boards can manage with bus cycle times down to 250µs like with
>>>> EtherCAT or Sercos III firmwares.
>>>>
>>>> So it seems in that cases that using Xenomai would be the way to go.
>>>> I suppose that it would be needed to modify or change the existing
>>>> driver but I can't figure out how things (Xenomai / RTDM / UIO) fit
>>>> together.
>>>>
>>>> UIO is the kernel module that allows the mapping of the board memory to
>>>> user space.
>>>>
>>>> The cifX driver uses the libpciaccess to pick up the board and retrieve
>>>> some board information from UIO before the mapping.
>>>> Then it uses pthread and rt functions when accessing the board.
>>>>
>>>> Since UIO and libpciaccess are only used during the initialization, is
>>>> it a problem for a Xenomai application ?
>>>>
>>>> We have setup a Xenomai system and tried to compile the user land
>>>> library with Xenomai options and flags and it seems we have been 
>>>> successful.
>>>> The driver should be using the POSIX skin of Xenomai if we have been lucky.
>>>>
>>>> I can't see why we would need RTDM. Any hint please ?
>>>>
>>>> I am an absolute beginner in the Xenomai arena, don't throw me to the
>>>> lions...
>>>>
>>>
>>> If UIO is used to register an interrupt handler for instance, the
>>> interrupt handler will not be called in real-time context when used with
>>> Xenomai, so, you would have to use the (deprecated) native or posix skin
>>> services to register a user-space interrupt handler, or more likely
>>> write an RTDM driver. On the other hand, if what you need is simply
>>> accessing the board registers through MMIO, then you do not need RTDM.
>>>
>>> While accessing registers from user-space may be tempting, there is a
>>> risk of ending up with an application where the driver code is not
>>> clearly separated. Writing a driver separated from the application is
>>> preferable, as it provides a sane isolation between the two. If you
>>> change the hardware, you just have to rewrite a driver which follows the
>>> same profile, if you want to write another application using the same
>>> driver, you can keep the driver.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you for your kind support Gilles.
>>
>> The cifX Device Driver is Hilscher's library to deal with cifX boards 
>> and is available for the major OSes.
>> Additionally it is available to anybody as source code, the cifX Driver 
>> Toolkit when one has to create a driver for his own OS.
>>
>> This driver library accesses the board interface which is a Dual Port 
>> Memory.
>>
>> So the user application shall use this layer and gets independence from 
>> the target OS.
>>
>> I understand that we should create an RTDM driver instead of a UIO 
>> driver and adapt the user library so that it uses the RTDM driver.
> 
>>
>> Am I right ?
> 
> 
> I tried to explain why it may be better to create an RTDM driver, but in
> this case this may not be the best option. The answer to your question
> depends on what you have to do to implement the driver. As I said, if
> you simply have to access MMIO registers, user-space may be fine, if you
> have to handle interrupts kernel-space (so, RTDM) is preferable.

Are we talking about linux/drivers/uio/uio_cif.c here? That one
obviously has interrupt support.

If your customers may want to use Xenomai 3 with I-pipe instead of
Preempt-RT underneath (both options will exist), RTDM will still be
required for interrupt handling. If you like to, you could propose such
a driver for Xenomai integration. That would ensure it will come with
future releases.

I also wonder if it didn't make sense for us to provide an UIO-like
infrastructure for such use cases (single-user device drivers with IRQ
event channel needs).

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai

Reply via email to