"J. J. Merelo" wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Why is there bool
> operator== (const string& str_)const
Are you sure that there is? I thought that there was no use of
std::string in Xerces-C? In the DOMString class?
>
> I agree that strings can be easily converted to char* ; but it
> would make things much easier.
Please rephrase. I don't understand.
> Besides, why the profusion of operator == and operator !=? Isn't it
> enough with one of them?
There's a Standard C++ Library header that generates some operator
overloads in terms of others, but I can't remember the name. Anway, it's
almost certainly not available on all platforms.
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
