Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> "J. J. Merelo" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Why is there bool
> > operator== (const string& str_)const
>
> Are you sure that there is? I thought that there was no use of
> std::string in Xerces-C? In the DOMString class?
>
Sorry, it should have said why _isn't_ there
> > Besides, why the profusion of operator == and operator !=? Isn't it
> > enough with one of them?
>
> There's a Standard C++ Library header that generates some operator
> overloads in terms of others, but I can't remember the name. Anway, it's
> almost certainly not available on all platforms.
Well, even without that, a != b is exactly the same as !( a == b ) ...
J
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
