"Tinny Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > According to your summary of count, if we count committers votes only, > then we don't have any vetos, but we also don't have enough 3 binding +1 > votes. If we count all users' votes, we have enough 3 +1 votes, but then > there are -1s as well .... > > Anyway, I think Jason's suggestion sounds good. Put the source tar in the > experimental folder and let people play with it for a couple of months. > Set a deadline for testing period. If no complaints, then put into CVS > later after the deadline .... Perfect. Thanks Tinny. The testing period with a deadline, with a new round of (possible) complaints is very useful. jas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Tinny Ng
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Tinny Ng
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Arnaud Le Hors
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vot... Jason E. Stewart
