Tinny Ng wrote:
>
> According to your summary of count, if we count committers votes only,
> then we don't have any vetos, but we also don't have enough 3 binding +1
> votes. If we count all users' votes, we have enough 3 +1 votes, but then
> there are -1s as well ....
>
> Anyway, I think Jason's suggestion sounds good. Put the source tar in the
> experimental folder and let people play with it for a couple of months.
> Set a deadline for testing period. If no complaints, then put into CVS
> later after the deadline ....
OK. I will do that. Thank you.
I just asked, because I thought that you were saying that I had to do
some more lobbying. Nevermind.
> Tinny
>
> Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > Tinny Ng wrote:
> >
> > > If there is any veto, and if you disagree
> > > with the veto, you should lobby the person who cast the veto. Until
> > > all vetos are resolved, then we can move on from there.
> > >
> > > Tinny
> >
> > Are there any vetos?
> > == Are there any -1s from committers?
> >
> > --
> > Murray Cumming
> > www.murrayc.com
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
