"Ritesh Garodia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi, > > I was trying to benchmark Xerces parser on HP UX 11i. After running some > tests, we observed > > * SAX and DOM parsers have some shared global data of size 83k, so average > amortized size of SAX parser is like 25k and of DOM 26.5k. (running to see > how many live instances of SAX/DOM parser can have in memory say of 100MB ie > scalability) > > * SAX Parser offers better performance than DOM parsers in terms of both > time and memory. For file with 100-700 elements of 50 bytes/element, SAX > parsing is nearly 1.5 times faster and has half the memory requirements.
If you could try the same test with the new IDOM, I'd be curious how much better it is than the old DOM. jas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
