"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> Ok, this confuses me. If it is a **MAJOR** release when are you
> changin the minor version number? I would think that you would change
> the major version number.
>
I guess, the major version is ** RESERVED ** for architectural change,
and that is why we have XercesJ(1) and XercesJ2 now, and similarily, we
may have XercesC2 in a forseeable future.
Again, as I said, this was the way it was, and frankly speaking, (why
things
happened that way) is well beyond my knowledge.
>
> Currently, the version convention for Xerces is rather arbitrary. What
> this suggests is the following:
>
> * bump MAJOR version when ABI changes
> * bump MINOR version for significant changes with no ABI change
> * bump REVISION for minor (bugfix) changes
>
Yes, that is the way it should be, and the best time to do this,
IMHO,
after XercesC2.
Rgds,
PeiYong
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
