Okay. I will have to take your word for it.
But no types, as far as I am aware, are anonymous in my schema files. At
least I think. Perhaps my schema files are not correct; I have found it
tremendously difficult interpreting what they heck the Schema Specs are
saying as they are horribly written.
So I guess my question now would be, when are types anonymous? Under what
circumstances can a type, that is fully qualified with a namespace prefix
and type (complex or simple) become anonymous?
Bob
>Type names are stored in the form {URI},{typename}. So, C0 , which is a dummy
>name generated (anonymous types), is the the type name.
>
>Khaled
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
