Local complexType/simpleType declarations are anonymous types as they do not have
a name associated with them.
e.g.
<element name="base>
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="child" type = "string"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
Khaled
Robert Buck wrote:
> Okay. I will have to take your word for it.
>
> But no types, as far as I am aware, are anonymous in my schema files. At
> least I think. Perhaps my schema files are not correct; I have found it
> tremendously difficult interpreting what they heck the Schema Specs are
> saying as they are horribly written.
>
> So I guess my question now would be, when are types anonymous? Under what
> circumstances can a type, that is fully qualified with a namespace prefix
> and type (complex or simple) become anonymous?
>
> Bob
>
> >Type names are stored in the form {URI},{typename}. So, C0 , which is a dummy
> >name generated (anonymous types), is the the type name.
> >
> >Khaled
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
