-----Original Message-----
From: David Schulze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:45 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1Can I ask why you are moving away from the MSXML parser? I was thinking of using that instead of Xerces in the future. Perhaps you have some reasons I should reconsider?ThanksDavid SchulzeDeLorme MappingYarmouth, ME, USA-----Original Message-----
From: Kohli, Naveen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:36 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1It would be great that if I can get to use new version of Xerces. I am starting a huge project next Monday and I would definitely like to use new parser if I can. We are tryingto move away from MS XML Parser. I have been very happy with Xerces 2.2 so far.
Can you point me to some tarbal tools?
Thanks,
Naveen-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1
Hi Naveen,
Sounds like you need to download some tools to handle tarballs. :)
Anyway, next week I'll try and upload some new binaries into our nightly
directories; it's been a while since the last release and some
bugs--particularly with respect to MSVC 7.1--have been fixed.Cheers,
Neil
Neil Graham
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Kohli, Naveen" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | ites.com> |
| | |
| | 06/20/2003 03:13 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | xerces-c-dev |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|| |
| To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| cc: |
| Subject: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 |
| |
| |
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I tried all 4 build and none of them could be opened. All throw error
"Error reading header after processing 0 entries".
May be its not my luck to use new version of Xercess. I think i will go
back to using older version.
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1
You can get nightly tarballs from here, if you don't want to set up CVS on
your machine:
http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/xml-xerces/
By the way, can you please set your newsreader to send plain text instead
of HTML?
Dave
|---------+--------------------------->
| | "Kohli, Naveen" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | Sites.com> |
| | |
| | 06/20/2003 09:34|
| | AM |
| | Please respond |
| | to xerces-c-dev |
|---------+--------------------------->
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------||
|
| To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| cc: (bcc: David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
|
| Subject: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1
|
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Here is million dollar question...
How do I get the newest source for Xercess2.3 from CVS? The reason I am
asking is because I don't know how to use the CVS system. Is there is a
simple way to get it. I tried to patch couple of files. But does not seem
to work. Any help in this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alberto Massari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12.05 20/06/2003 -0400, Kohli, Naveen wrote:
>Pardon my ignorance in this matter...
>Do I need to get this file only or should I get the whole tree.
It's better if you get the whole tree; I had to patch several files to make
VC++ 7.1 compile Xerces 2.3
Alberto
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1
We
have been using MS parser in lot of our products in the past. It has created
more headache for us. A lot of it has to do with backward compatibility. Every
new release end up creating problems for applications using older version.
Sometime they even mess up the features within same version for different
service pack release. And then some MS products require newer versions of XML
parser. So user has no choice but to accept whatever MS wants. This sometimes
has broken the existing applications. Other issue is MS parser has not moved to
DOM2 level.
There
are some properietry features in their parser that I like especially namespace
support for SOAP messages. But I am more concerned about consistent behaviour
from version to version.
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Alberto Massari
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Kohli, Naveen
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Kohli, Naveen
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 david_n_bertoni
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Kohli, Naveen
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Neil Graham
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Kohli, Naveen
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 David Schulze
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Neil Graham
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Dave Connet
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Kohli, Naveen
- RE: Xerces2.3 Compile errors On VC7.1 Kohli, Naveen