"c version of xerces" ---->>>> there was no "wstring" in "c" can there be anything more obvious than that ???
Or "wstring" was not a cross-platform construct ???? -----Original Message----- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Giampiero Gabbiani Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 3:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: XMLCh vs wchar_t Hi to all, just a question, why during the development of c version of xerces, a new 'wide' character string has been developed, instead of using the standard c++ wstring? I find this a little confusing... 'cause it force to continuosly transcode() between the two ones! Regards Giampiero --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
