On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Scott Cantor wrote: > > I'm sure there are good reasons for why the C++ committee didn't mandate > UCS-2 for wchar_t, but whatever they were, they've gone a long way in > convincing the XML community to stay with Java and ignore C++. So I hope it > was worth it. ;-)
Too many people had settled on different encoding schemes, probably. But in terms of XML processing, D (digitalmars.com) may be worth looking at as its internal string representations are expected to be UTF (8, 16, 32). And things will be even better once the port of ICU is complete. Sean --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
