Scott Cantor wrote: >> Because std::wstring is not so standard... for instance, gcc >> 2.95 doesn't have it. > > Heh, if that was the reason (as opposed to the fact that the *encoding* of > wstring isn't standard), I'd be screaming for the change. ;-) > > -- Scott
So, what's the problem with std::wstring's encoding (or, where can I read something about it)? Giampiero. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
