Assaf Arkin wrote: > > Ignorable whitespace, not just whitespace. Good point.
> I think the feature should be "include ignorable whitespace as text > nodes" and off by default. So how about the following ID? http://apache.org/xml/features/dom/include-ignorable-whitespace It's getting a little verbose but that's probably erring on the side of understandability. -- Andy Clark * IBM, JTC - Silicon Valley * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
