+1 from me :-)

arkin

Andy Clark wrote:
> 
> Assaf Arkin wrote:
> >
> > Ignorable whitespace, not just whitespace.
> 
> Good point.
> 
> > I think the feature should be "include ignorable whitespace as text
> > nodes" and off by default.
> 
> So how about the following ID?
> 
>   http://apache.org/xml/features/dom/include-ignorable-whitespace
> 
> It's getting a little verbose but that's probably erring on
> the side of understandability.
> 
> --
> Andy Clark * IBM, JTC - Silicon Valley * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to