Great! You can take a look at the current source code, on the downloads page. There are still some bugs in there (e.g. references to XML4C3), but they're being tracked down and squashed this week.
Because of going public in the last few days, the source code base for Xerces-C is likely to be a bit unstable right now, so keep that in mind. It will definitely change this week, as the easy bugs (directory names, documentation, packaging bugs) are found and fixed quickly. I personally think the sooner we get in the FreeBSD changes, the better.... Thanks for joining the effort! Mike Sander van Zoest wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > > I haven't been on this list long, so if I've missed a previous > > conversation about FreeBSD sorry. > > I've been working on porting the IBM XML4C and associated ICU libraries > > to FreeBSD. I've *finally* got all the ICU stuff to compile and even > > pass some of the self tests, but it seg faults all over the place - the > > maths routines are /really/ ick in places. > > Great. I was planning on making sure we had a functional FreeBSD 3.3 > and Redhat Linux 6.X builds. > > > Anyway, I've been pointed at xml.apache.org, told it's based on XML4C, > > had a nosy around and can't see any mention of any FreeBSD stuff. Is > > anyone already working on it or shall I just continue my efforts? > > I am definately interested in having a FreeBSD port and am willing to > contribute all the slim amount of time, I have towards this. > > Cheers, > > -- > Sander van Zoest [EMAIL PROTECTED] > High Geek (858) 623-7442 > MP3.com, Inc. http://www.mp3.com/
