Steve Suehring wrote:
> 
> I would much rather stick with make.  From an implementation standpoint
> it's much easier to debug make on the end-user level than it is to work
> with another tool.

Not for Java stuff.

Look, this is the Ant build.xml file for Cocoon

<project name="Cocoon">
  <target name="main">
   <mkdir dir="build"/>
   <javac srcdir="src" destdir="build"/>
   <jar jarfile="cocoon.jar" basedir="build" items="org/apache/cocoon"/>
  </target>
  <target name="clean">
    <deltree dir="build"/>
  </target>
</project>

now, please, tell me: would any make be _this_ simple? ;)

I _strongly_ propose that we use Ant to build all the Apache pure-java
projects. For non-pure stuff, it might get trickier, but still you could
have ant called by make for the java part (as tomcat will do).

I suggest you people to take a look at it, if you haven't done so.

-- 
Stefano Mazzocchi      One must still have chaos in oneself to be
                          able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                             Friedrich Nietzsche


Reply via email to