[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the package name for an earlier version of that DOM was
> com.ibm.xml.dom, so making it org.apache.xml.dom would make a certain
> amount of sense...
>
> However, it's worth pointing out that you may wind up wanting to make
> multiple implementations of the DOM available, tuned for different
> purposes. You may or may not want to consider that when picking your
> package name.
Yes... But the DOM implementation is not tied to the Parser... The parser
USES it, but also other components might need it (new Instance of a
document, for example...).
So, IMHO it makes sense to keep them out of the parser namespace...
Pier
