-1 for this. Two reasons for that. 1. Am attaching a mail from Stefano which he sent out a while ago on the jakarta mailing list regarding packaging structure. Based on that till we have a place for all the common utilities to go I think it is a good idea to hold back to creating packages in subprojects. This issue has to be resolved for all apache related projects.
2. All the DOM nodes that are there in xerces are specifically for xml and moving that into a org.apache.dom / org.apache.xml.dom would mean that if the dom nodes for HTML or any other DOM implementation were to be done by someone then again the package naming issue would arrise... So taking that into consideration it would be better to leave it in xerces. - Rajiv P.S. A step aside just curious on how do you plan to use the DOM nodes in other applications??? >Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm >X-No-Archive: yes >list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] >User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) >Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:38:08 -0800 >Subject: Request for Vote: Dom Package Change >From: Pierpaolo Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Mime-version: 1.0 >Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit > >Hi all... >Just a question. I noticed that the DOM implementation used by the >xml.apache.org project sits in Xerces packages (org.apache.xerces.dom). > >Since the DOM implementation is not only a prerogative of the parser, but >might be also nedeed by other tools, I would like to see it under the more >general "org.apache.dom" or "org.apache.xml.dom" package... > >Comments? > > Pier >
--- Begin Message ---
--- End Message ---
