You are right. Current names of FilterAction value do not match those in the IDL. We will make the changes as you suggested. Thanks.
Chih-Hsiang Chou IBM Center for Java Technology - Silicon Valley [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arnold, Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 4:49 PM Subject: RE: Proposed Xerces-C API Changes Why aren't the values for FilterAction: FILTER_ACCEPT, FILTER_REJECT and FILTER_SKIP? That would be consistent with your treatment of ShowType.
