So, are you suggesting that if you had a COM wrapper for Xerces-C, that looked just like the MS COM API's, you might use it? Speaking hypothetically, of course.
If such a thing existed, would you be willing to help test it and maintain it? Hypothetically speaking, Mike Scott Sanders wrote: > > >MSXML is also not Open Source and not cross-platform... > > I am well aware of that. They are not. > > >I'm curious, does your group already have MSXML code written in COM? > Yes, that is the case. Our application is so COM distributed that COM is > necessary (ironic?)
