I, hypothetically speaking, of course, think that there might be quite a few people willing to maintain a COM wrapper like that...
That would mean a little less dependence on any given parser. All we would need to change is the CLSID! I would be quite interested is something like this. Thanks, -----Original Message----- From: Mike Pogue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Xerces-C Multithreading So, are you suggesting that if you had a COM wrapper for Xerces-C, that looked just like the MS COM API's, you might use it? Speaking hypothetically, of course. If such a thing existed, would you be willing to help test it and maintain it? Hypothetically speaking, Mike Scott Sanders wrote: > > >MSXML is also not Open Source and not cross-platform... > > I am well aware of that. They are not. > > >I'm curious, does your group already have MSXML code written in COM? > Yes, that is the case. Our application is so COM distributed that COM is > necessary (ironic?)
