Hi Jim, Yes, I agree. One of use here screwed up the packaging. It really makes me wonder which copy of the project file I checked, when I posted my response on this earlier. It must have been a fresh checkout from CVS.
Sorry about this. I will make sure we get a correctly packaged source archive out on Apache. rahul ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Rahul Jain'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 9:04 PM Subject: RE: Microsoft C++ project files missing from 1.1.0 > Hi Rahul, > > Actually, the file I downloaded is listed in the /dist directory as: > > Xerces-C-src_1_1_0.zip 03-Mar-2000 17:56 3.3M > > I rechecked xerces-all.dsw and I don't think it has the CR/LF > newlines. Here's a couple of lines of a hex dump of it: > > 000000 23 20 4d 69 63 72 6f 73 6f 66 74 20 44 65 76 65 # Micros oft Deve > 000010 6c 6f 70 65 72 20 53 74 75 64 69 6f 20 50 72 6f loper St udio Pro > 000020 6a 65 63 74 20 46 69 6c 65 20 2d 20 4e 61 6d 65 ject Fil e - Name > 000030 3d 22 44 4f 4d 50 72 69 6e 74 22 20 2d 20 50 61 ="DOMPri nt" - Pa > 000040 63 6b 61 67 65 20 4f 77 6e 65 72 3d 3c 34 3e 0a ckage Ow ner=<4>. > 000050 23 20 4d 69 63 72 6f 73 6f 66 74 20 44 65 76 65 # Micros oft Deve > 000060 6c 6f 70 65 72 20 53 74 75 64 69 6f 20 47 65 6e loper St udio Gen > 000070 65 72 61 74 65 64 20 42 75 69 6c 64 20 46 69 6c erated B uild Fil > 000080 65 2c 20 46 6f 72 6d 61 74 20 56 65 72 73 69 6f e, Forma t Versio > 000090 6e 20 36 2e 30 30 0a 23 20 2a 2a 20 44 4f 20 4e n 6.00.# ** DO N > > Notice offset 4F and 96. > > The .dsp files have the same problem (for MSDOS). Here's a bit of > DOMPrint.dsp: > > 000000 23 20 4d 69 63 72 6f 73 6f 66 74 20 44 65 76 65 # Micros oft Deve > 000010 6c 6f 70 65 72 20 53 74 75 64 69 6f 20 50 72 6f loper St udio Pro > 000020 6a 65 63 74 20 46 69 6c 65 20 2d 20 4e 61 6d 65 ject Fil e - Name > 000030 3d 22 44 4f 4d 50 72 69 6e 74 22 20 2d 20 50 61 ="DOMPri nt" - Pa > 000040 63 6b 61 67 65 20 4f 77 6e 65 72 3d 3c 34 3e 0a ckage Ow ner=<4>. > 000050 23 20 4d 69 63 72 6f 73 6f 66 74 20 44 65 76 65 # Micros oft Deve > 000060 6c 6f 70 65 72 20 53 74 75 64 69 6f 20 47 65 6e loper St udio Gen > 000070 65 72 61 74 65 64 20 42 75 69 6c 64 20 46 69 6c erated B uild Fil > 000080 65 2c 20 46 6f 72 6d 61 74 20 56 65 72 73 69 6f e, Forma t Versio > 000090 6e 20 36 2e 30 30 0a 23 20 2a 2a 20 44 4f 20 4e n 6.00.# ** DO N > 0000a0 4f 54 20 45 44 49 54 20 2a 2a 0a 0a 23 20 54 41 OT EDIT **..# TA > > Perhaps the suggestion that these files be tagged as binary for source > control is a good one. > > Thanks, > Jim Pearson > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rahul Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 5:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Microsoft C++ project files missing from 1.1.0 > > > If you downloaded the archives targetted towards the Unix users > (.tar.gz) and moved the files over to the Windows environment > in binary mode, then you will see the reported behaviour. Its > due to the different line ending characters. > > I just checked the Xerces-C src 1.1.0 .zip file (targetted for the > Windows env). The .dsw file looks good. > > rahul > > > >
