Note that we have a couple of people who would like to donate an
HTML parser to xml.apache.org, to be added to Xerces. The ones I know of
are:
ExOffice (extremely well tested, used for web spiders),
Sun (I haven't seen it yet), and
IBM (I haven't seen it yet either).
I suspect that if people are interested in this, we ought to have people look
at all three,
and figure out whether one is better, or whether they should be merged somehow
before
being checked in...assuming there's interest in this!
Any volunteers?
Mike
Cox Andy wrote:
>
> If the HTML is not well-formed XML (which most is not), you are correct.
>
> Andy
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 10:32 AM
> | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Subject: HTML parsing
> |
> |
> | For what I can tell, I cannot expect to be able to parse an HTML doc with
> | the xerces parser? I was hoping to use the C++ SAX parser to find <IMG>
> | tags but I don't think I will be able to do that. Can someone confirm
> this
> | dreadful fact?
