In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote: > Hmmm... So you are saying its resource compiler is misinterpreting the text > in the RC file? That would be problematic. If both the VC++ resource > compiler (under both NT and 98) and the Borland resource compiler would > directly take the L"abcde" style wide character constants, instead of the > escaped versions, then I'd be glad to change it to use that style. But I'm > kinda thinking that perhaps 98 wouldn't be able to eat those. > > Perhaps you can figure out how to make Borland take wide chars in the RC > file? Since the RC file format is Unicode anyway, its difficult to imagine > that the resource compiler can't understand Unicode. >
Not quite. The Borland compiler (NB that I am actually talking of the "old" BC5.02/BCB1 compiler here, I haven't tried it with a later Builder) is quite happy with L"Nota" but L"\x004E\x006F\x0074\x0061" is not interpreted as intended - and it is this version that appears in src\utils\platforms\win32 What I don't know (haven't tried it (yet)) is if the MS compilers will accept the L"Nota" format properly. As we are talking compiler tools here, the NT/98 differences are irrelevant. Mike
