Edwin Goei wrote:
> Is there a reason you chose "include-comments" instead of
> "ignore-comments" w/ a default of false? The "ignore-comments" would
> match JAXP better but your proposal would work too.
Just for consistency with the names of features that we already
have. The particular example I'm thinking of is:
http://apache.org/xml/features/dom/include-ignorable-whitespace
--
Andy Clark * IBM, TRL - Japan * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
