> Andy Clark wrote:
> when namespace processing was
> on, I just needed to figure out the prefix and localpart for
> any default attribute added to an element within the
> XMLDTDValidator. The changes to the DTDGrammar and Namespace-
> Support classes submitted weren't required.
As seen in the grammar class
2-D array of QName is used to store qualified attribute
names, QName objects are set
like fQName.setValues(null,rawName,rawName,null)
localPart and rawName being equal.
i feel,we should store the values right in the Grammar
first place
like fQName.setValues(null,localPart,rawName,null).
I would like to know if there are any reasons for not doing so,if i am missing
one.
Thanks
- Neeraj -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
