Gopal Sharma wrote:
> > - find a sensible home for v2.SAXParser, v2.SchemaParser,
> > v2.SchemaParserConfiguration
>
> I feel, we can put them in xerces.parser or xerces.parser.schema (Just for time
> being ).
I'm sure you meant "xerces.parsers".
^
I don't think we need a "parsers.schema" package. However,
perhaps we should have a "parsers.config" package where we
would put BasicParserConfiguration, StandardParserConfiguration,
and any other parser configurations that we want to bundle
with Xerces in the future. I suggest this because we will
probably have only a handful of parsers (DOM, SAX, etc)
but we will most likely have a lot of different parser
configurations that people can pick and choice from. So it
would be better to keep them somewhere else.
--
Andy Clark * IBM, TRL - Japan * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
