Andu Wrote:-
> > > - find a sensible home for v2.SAXParser, v2.SchemaParser,
> > > v2.SchemaParserConfiguration
> >
> > I feel, we can put them in xerces.parser or xerces.parser.schema (Just for
time
> > being ).
>
> I'm sure you meant "xerces.parsers".
^
Ohhh.. Yep
>
> I don't think we need a "parsers.schema" package.
I thought for this, just to keep it simple till it is ready to merge to
StandardParserConfiguration.
> However,
> perhaps we should have a "parsers.config" package where we
> would put BasicParserConfiguration, StandardParserConfiguration,
> and any other parser configurations that we want to bundle
> with Xerces in the future. I suggest this because we will
> probably have only a handful of parsers (DOM, SAX, etc)
> but we will most likely have a lot of different parser
> configurations that people can pick and choice from. So it
> would be better to keep them somewhere else.
It is not at all a bad idea. But, I was not knowing that we are having some plan
to provide some specific configuration. Can you tell more about it?
Gopal
-----------------------
SUN Microsystems, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
