Hi Gopal and all,
I've just committed a copy of AbstractNumericDV that Neeraj had sent me
privately. This solved all but one compilation error--one array hadn't
been initialized, so I initialized it to a completely arbitrary value (see
a REVISIT in DateTimeDV for details).
<DISCLAIMER>
I'm committing all this stuff as a favour to those working on the new
datatype validator design (Neeraj, Gopal and Sandy to be specific) since
Sandy's absent and Gopal and Neeraj can't commit. Other than making sure
stuff compiles, since none of the main-line code depends on this stuff yet
I absolve myself of responsibility for it. :-))
</DISCLAIMER>
Cheers!
Neil
Neil Graham
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Phone: 905-413-3519, T/L 969-3519
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gopal Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/05/2001 12:21:21 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: [xerces2]simpletype redesign
Neil Wrote:->
> I've committed your files--even though none of them compile...
Thx..
> Seems
> there's a problem with AbstractDateTimeDV; probably has to do with one of
> Neeraj's patches that I was not able to apply. We'll definitely need to
> find a reliable way for you folks to send us patches, and make sure that
if
> we're to commit something that we have everything necessary so the code
> will at least compile...
The problem is due to the non-availability of AbstractNumericDV. Because of
this, the code is not compiling there.I am sending the AbstractNumericDV.
Cheers
Gopal
-----------------------
SUN Microsystems, India
(See attached file: AbstractNumericDV.java)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AbstractNumericDV.java
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
