Andy wrote:- > Gopal Sharma wrote: > > The problem is due to the non-availability of AbstractNumericDV. Because of > > this, the code is not compiling there.I am sending the AbstractNumericDV. > > I'm having problems with the design of the datatype stuff > that you guys are working on.Could you please reply to my > post titled "[Xerces2] Datatype Validators" and explain > what you see is wrong with the interfaces we already have > and why you're creating new ones?
I wish, i could. but no problem, Neeraj did that job. Even though,there is nothing fundamentally wrong in using Factory pattern, but the problem was complexity, which was making the caching of Datatype validators hard to implement. > > I don't think we should work on the implementation until > we have a clear design as to how all of this is going to > work for DTD validation, XML Schema validation, grammar > caching, etc. I don't think it's been thought through > very well, yet. Agreed, and I can see that new design is going to take care all the above. A plus is, we have a simple, easy to maintain, extensible & standalone component available. Cheers Gopal ----------------------- SUN Microsystems, India --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
