hi, if you are interested in efficient and parser independent API for XML pull parsing please check XmlPull API that has 3 implementations: very small kXML2, focused on perfromance XPP3/MXP1 and one that is based on Xerces2 XNI (similarly to NekoPull) and is the most XML compliant thanks to great work of folks working on Xerces2 :-)
if you use XmlPull API you give users free choice to choose XML pull parser implementation that works best for their applications without need to change code, please check http://www.xmlpull.org we are about to release next major 1.2 version as current API development version 1.1.x tree is now very stable. thanks, alek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Interesting approach! I'm curious what the impact on performance is. Have > you done any performnce tests comparing a SAX->buffer->PULL parse to a > straight SAX parse? > > |---------+----------------------------> > | | "Peter B. West" | > | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| > | | om.au> | > | | | > | | 11/26/2002 08:44 | > | | PM | > | | Please respond to| > | | xerces-j-dev | > | | | > |---------+----------------------------> > >>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > | > | > | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > | cc: > | > | Subject: XMLPullParser > | > >>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > xercesj-devs, > > I am a committer with FOP, and I recently posted a description of work I > had done on the front end of FOP Alt-Design. This involved buffering > SAX events, and providing a series of get/expect methods to access them, > effectively reversing the direction of control of parser event > processing. That is, I had used buffering to implement a pull parser. > > The posting triggered a lot of discussion, in the course of which my > attention was drawn to the StAX project, where I saw a reference to the > XNI pull parser configuration. > > I don't know how much work has been done on pull parsing, but if > developers on this list are interested in what has been done in FOP, I > will forward my original fop-dev post to this list. > > Peter > -- > Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/ > "Lord, to whom shall we go?" > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The ancestor of every action is a thought. - Ralph Waldo Emerson --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
