Sorry for the off topic-ness, couldn't think where else to ask this.
 
With a schema definition for a complexType, can you define the simpleType part of it?
 
It really seems silly when the content is mixed, but if a complexType is only complex because it has attributes
i could see wanting to define the simpleContent part
 
<phone type="pulse">555-1212</phone>
 
how do you schema-ize the 555-1212 part?
 
 

Reply via email to