Complex type with simple content is what you need. You can get one by extending a simple type. For your example, assume you have a PhoneNumber simple type for 555-1212, then you can
<element name="phone">
<complexType>
<simpleContent>
<extension base="my:PhoneNumber">
<attribute name="type" .../>
HTH,
Sandy Gao
Software Developer, IBM Canada
(1-905) 413-3255
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| "Dave Brosius"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/30/2005 09:42 PM
|
|
Sorry for the off topic-ness, couldn't think where else to ask this.
With a schema definition for a complexType, can you define the simpleType part of it?
It really seems silly when the content is mixed, but if a complexType is only complex because it has attributes
i could see wanting to define the simpleContent part
<phone type="pulse">555-1212</phone>
how do you schema-ize the 555-1212 part?
