On 11 Jul 2002, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > "Erwin Frise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Xerces itself seems to run fine (all the libxerces-c1_7_0.so tests pass > > with flying colors) - just the perl module causes the NullPointer > > exception. The source of Xerces.so (the shared library for perl which > > bombs) is over 25,000 lines and I'm not planning on sifting through that > > to find the problem. I cannot find anything obvious that we're doing > > wrong - according to the info from Makefile.PL we're using the correct > > libxerces and includes. Xerces.so definitly points to the correct > > libxerces-c1_7_0.so and we're using a resonable recent glibc-2.2.2. > > Possibly a perl 5.6.0 issue or a real bug? > > Hey all, > > I'd love to help diagnose the situation, but I'll need more info: > > - architecture > - did you compile xerces-c from source or are you using the binary > - gcc version > - what's the problem? Run time problem or compile problem? >
What does the missing symbol demangle to? I've seen numerous cases where the library and client get built with different notions of parameter size, type, etc. It's worthwhile (assuming the base name of the routine is present) to demangle both references and see if they jive. Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------- Steven N. Hirsch tie-line: 446-6557 ext: 802-769-6557 Staff Engineer Methodology Integration Team ASIC Product Development IBM Microelectronics ---------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
