On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 03:50, David Starks-Browning wrote: > The fact that Xerces.so is pulling in libgcc_s.so.1 suggests to me > that you are building with gcc-3.x. Can you check this? I ask > because previously you had reported gcc-2.95.3, perhaps when > describing the Xerces C++ build. I think these need to be the same > when dealing with C++ libraries.
David, you where (almost) right on the spot. While I made sure that everything was using gcc 2.95.3 to compile, apparently somewhere during compilation, the gcc 3 libraries, left from an "unauthorized" installation of gcc 3.01 in /usr/local, where used instead. We removed all traces of gcc 3 and _finally_ got rid of the error. I should have read the ldd output more carefully - I never considered that it would preferentially use the gcc 3 libraries when everything else appeared to be using 2.95. Thanks a lot for all your help - I have really appreciated all of your input. Erwin -- Erwin Frise, PhD Systems manager/Bioinformatics scientist Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project One Cyclotron Road, Building 64 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 Tel: (510) 486-7251 Fax: (510) 486-6798 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
