2008/5/7 Philip Van Hoof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi there, > > I think it would be useful to have a DBus namespace for future > extensions to the Xesam spec, like indeed the paged GetHits. > > Is this something we can get specified in 1.0 already? It shouldn't > influence existing services that don't utilise this. >
What do we really need to namespace? I guess that it is just a new interface added on the standard Xesam object and bus name? In this case I think it would be wise to keep it in backend specific namespaces to start out with. Then if people agree on something we can put it under a new interface in 1.* (if that makes sense - if it break or conflict with existing functionality it should be 2.0 material of course). Cheers, Mikkel
_______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
