On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > Ok, might as well give my own perception of our situation then :-) My own > limited knowledge will hopefully provoke someone to elaborate...
Drat, you beat me to it. :) > Beagle: > * API completeness: Complete It's actually at RC1. I need to make an update. > * Onto support: Support for a limited subset of the onto. Most common > fields can be expected to work. Check. > * XML Query support: Check Check, with the exception that grouping of AND and OR is broken (extremely non-trivial to fix, doesn't seem worth it for now). > * User Search Lang. support: Actually just use the standard Beagle search > language, which is close enough to the Xesam USL so that users might never > notice the difference Yep. > * Roadmap: Anticipate Xesam developments and quality of the API. If deemed > good move the xesam-adaptor into Beagle's core Check. We had a couple of people using the code, but I'm waiting for more feedback/adoption before making the move. Best, -- Arun Raghavan (http://nemesis.accosted.net) v2sw5Chw4+5ln4pr6$OFck2ma4+9u8w3+1!m?l7+9GSCKi056 e6+9i4b8/9HTAen4+5g4/8APa2Xs8r1/2p5-8 hackerkey.com _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
