> > > > It should be post xesam 1.0 obviously > > How about lists of structs? Ie structs in your triple store.
sure so long as structs can only contain simple types (no lists or nested structs) > > To have any real benefit this actually needs to go in 1.0 as it would > require incompatible changes to the ontology. As an alternative > solution we could simply remove the affected fields from the 0.95 > ontology and then re-introduce them as structs in 1.X for X>0 (ie ship > a reduced onto in 1.0). Either way would add incompatible changes to > the onto though. > which fields would be structs in the existing onto? jamie _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
