On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > I think we have agreement on this. I have put it on the list of > pending changes for the next release (be that 1.0 or RC3): > http://xesam.org/main/XesamUpdates > > So if nobody starts complaining this one will go in. Speak now or > forever hold your silence :-)
One question -- shouldn't the sort.order field now be a list of strings of the length of sort.fields? I think this makes things a little uglier, but is probably necessary. Cheers, -- Arun Raghavan (http://nemesis.accosted.net) v2sw5Chw4+5ln4pr6$OFck2ma4+9u8w3+1!m?l7+9GSCKi056 e6+9i4b8/9HTAen4+5g4/8APa2Xs8r1/2p5-8 hackerkey.com _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
