"Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I won't claim that it is a complete bug ontology. These are just the >> fields I found useful in the given case. > > He, I bet you can pick up a good flamewar over this if you poke some > of the maintainers of the various bug trackers out there :-)
For sure. Even Don Armstrong, maintainer of Debbugs (and supporting me with its SOAP interface) might shoot me, because I use some other keywords than stoned in Debbugs. "Severity" is called "tags" there, which has another meaning in XESAM. > OTOH, if you polish it and out it out somewhere public you might get > the moment of first-to-set-up-shop and have other folks run with it > :-) That's something I have on my long-term agenda, indeed. But first I'ld like to finish the Debbugs interface. And then, it takes at least a comparison of Debbugs, Bugzilla, GNATS, Launchpad, etc (to quote only some of them) in order to find common attributes. > debbugs:affectedPackages might be useful to some... Just thinking out loud... There are debbugs:blockedBy and debbugs:blocks. I don't use them ATM, because they cannot be sent in the SOAP query (like other fields). > Cheers, > Mikkel Best regards, Michael. _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
