2008/12/14 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[email protected]> > 2008/12/14 Evgeny Egorochkin <[email protected]> > >> Guys, >> >> I've been lamenting the lack of an issue tracker on xesam.org for quite >> some >> time. >> >> It would be a much better solution than erratic use of Xesammailing list, >> IRC >> channel(s) and wiki. >> >> We lack in at least these areas: >> >> * No transparency of decision-making It's often unclear why something was >> done >> this way and not another. Maybe there was a good reason and maybe someone >> still remembers why. >> >> * Usually discussions on the ML and IRC touch lots of different topics, >> making >> it hard to follow the issue you you are interested in. >> >> * No way to track current issues and their priorities, especially for >> people >> who are unable to keep tabs on everything that's going on within the >> project. >> >> * Long-standing issues may end up forgotten and resurface at a later date, >> sometimes too late. Same can happen to feedback and comments for these >> issues. >> >> So I'm wondering just how hard it is to add something like this to >> xesam.org? >> > > I whole heartedly agree. You should file a bug in our bugzilla about this > :-) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/ in the "xesam" product. > > We actually has had this set up for quite some time, but it has > regrettably not been used. I here by pledge to start using it more :-) I > hope you guys will do that too. > > If you follow the "Projecct Structure" link on the front page of the wiki > then you will actually find this mentioned, but it might be better in a more > discoverable place. >
Or... If people prefer some other issue tracking system then we could set something up at xesam.org. Or I can url rewrite bugs.xesam.org to the FDO tracker. -- Cheers, Mikkel
_______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
