2009/4/23 Roberto Guido <[email protected]>: > On Thursday 23 April 2009 16:16:01 you wrote: >> and it seems that a lot of the >> high-profile FOSS projects are moving towards the Nepomuk ontologies. >> > Until a Xesam specification isn't out, it seems obvious people will follow the > coolest and most hype'd project of the moment. > > Anyway, I feel both Xesam and Nepomuk lack some degree of integration with > existing formats used above all across the web, but this is a too complex > concept to be summarized here, too poorly detailed to be exposed as a > proposal, too destructive about existing specifications, and I've read too > little documentation to be sure myself of this. > Let's think about 1.0, now ;-)
There is much right in what you say. One: its counter productive to get into a meta-discussion at this point. Two: This discussion will be very very long :-) >> I simply got suck up into >> starting out a new company in my spare time as well as having >> incredibly busy times in my day time job. >> > Is there any task which may be delegated to someone else, me for example? Maybe... Here's a rundown of what needs to be done: * We had some bugs with our RDFS -> MoinMoin script (which I just fixed this and updated the wiki pages) * Copy (or "branch") the pages in the bulleted list on http://xesam.org/main/XesamSearchUnstable to versions ending with a 100, like fx: copy http://xesam.org/main/XesamSearchAPI to http://xesam.org/main/XesamSearchAPI100. Like you see in the other two releases listed on the front page. * Fix all links in the newly copied *100 pages so that they point to the other *100-versions * Make a Xesam100 page just like we have for Xesam95 and Xesam90 * With all this done, run a custom script of mine that collects all the relevant pages and create PDFs -- Cheers, Mikkel _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
