On Friday 24 April 2009 17:22:08 Jamie McCracken wrote: > at this time so xesam does not look a viable standard at the moment > I can accept this, the most important point is to admit it.
Next question is: would ever be Xesam a viable standard? Proposal from Ivan (please, correct me!!!) is to fork the Nepomuk ontology and maintain it in a community-driven structure, defining then the common API to access information. Is this possible? Is this a solution? Is this in the interest? Would "relevant trackers" agree to apply what specified here? What I'd like to see is to avoid a new failure as in Xesam 0.X: if a standardization is possible let's work to define that, otherwise close this project and move efforts in other directions. -- Roberto -MadBob- Guido http://claimid.com/madbob _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
