On Sunday 26 April 2009 14:41:38 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: > This is only a problem for those talking to the Xesam provider > directly. Otherwise a lot can be done inside client libraries. > I agree with this: also when a complete rewrite of Xesam will happen, high-level APIs will wrap changes and at least be integrated with a complexity far lower than internal protocol.
> I think that if we release 1.0 with a note saying that 2.0 will be > completely incompatible and will arrive in 1 year (at the earliest!) > will be the "fair" choice. > >From a wider point of view, priority may be to untap semantic capabilities for desktop software. And in one or more years more and more things may happen: useless (and dangerous) is to maintain current fragmentation, let permit community to work in the middle. -- Roberto -MadBob- Guido http://claimid.com/madbob _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
