On Tuesday 02 June 2009 19:38:42 Evgeny Egorochkin wrote: > It would be a very weak position for OSCAF to formally have absolutely no > influence on the standard it tries to promote. > > [...] > > What are we missing: > Equality.
Since a single entity (OSCAF) has more influence than others, and that entity is sponsored by... I don't know, due list of current members still isn't online, "all animals are equal but someone is more equal than other". Of course members in OSCAF (or OSCAF itself, or a technical delegation, or a sub-organization...) would partecipate to the development cycle, exactly as any other individual, but that "influence" you mentioned is exactly the unclear point about involving a commercial structure on top of decision making process. As a side note: can you, OSCAF fans, agree about your positions and aims of your proposed structure? In previous mail Sebastian writes "this is pretty much what I have in mind", now you reply to disagree completely, it isn't so easy to understand you guys... -- Roberto -MadBob- Guido http://claimid.com/madbob _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
