On 9 июня 2009 04:52:06 Antoni Mylka wrote: > Hello Xesamies (Xesams, Xesamians, is there an accepted form? ),
Xesamies sounds good :) > I volunteer for: > - moving the current ontology source files to whatever repository is > chosen, both the trunk and the 8 'revisions' already 'released' > - dropping the legacy constraint that the ontologies must be editable > in Protege, which didn't work anyway, and make the protege->NRL > conversion step unnecessary > - moving the doc generator to whatever repository is chosen > - setting up the "build" so that with a single call to 'ant' the > documentation will be regenerated and all example files will be > validated against the current version of the ontology > - spearheading the effort to get some export of the trac history from > the nepomuk trac and importing it to whatever issue tracker is chosen > (I personally favour trac, dunno how difficult it would be to > import trac issues to bugzilla - all kinds of comments welcome). > - maintaining the 'build' code infrastructure > - helping all other ontology maintainers as far as I can > - maintaining all the ontology parts for which no separate maintainer > steps up. I've been reading through the thread and it seems there > were two people willing to take on the maintenance duties. > NRL - > NAO - > NIE - > NFO - Ivan Frade > NMO - Roberto Guido > NCO - > NCAL - > NEXIF - > NID3 - > > Dunno if the original authors of NRL (as stated at [7]) will want to get > involved with it now. It seems that the number of volunteers is far from > astonishing ATM :) I can afford to be a backup maintainer for all this. As long as people are willing to write code, I'll find the time to tell them what to do^H^H^H^H^H maintain ontologies :) This can work for awhile. More visibility and synergetic effects will fix this over time. -- Evgeny _______________________________________________ Xesam mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xesam
