because bidi has done absolutely noting in the creation of the pdf-file from
this minimal text, but claims it:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{bidi,xltxtra}
\setmainfont{STFangsong}
\begin{document}
中國好
\end{document}
Rembrandt
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 05:33, Vafa Khalighi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> This is question for Vafa: can you explain what is the reason that in .pdf
>> file, created using xelatex+polyglossia with use of arabic as secondary
>> language (the main is latin), bidi is credited as "creator"? I do understand
>> that bidi is used for arabic, but, with due respect, I think it's very
>> unfair to declare it as creator application instead of xe(la)tex.
>>
>>
> I have done this because someone in the past requested it. Why is this
> unfair?
>
> --
> Best wishes,
> Vafa Khalighi
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
>
--
人有不為也而後可以有為
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
